Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Discrimination at work again, or is it?


Mathew L. Wald of the New York Times gives us some insight about the difference policies that apply to humans and pets when they are given radioactive drugs. People have to freedom to go back and rest while under this type of medication while animals such as cat and dogs are required to be locked up in the hospital.
In October, Representative Edward J. Markey, Democrat of Massachusetts, complained to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that its policy on human thyroid patients was creating dilemmas for patients, some of whom are sent home immediately after radiation treatment to households with children or pregnant women. 
While it is understandable that humans are generally more civilized and can conduct themselves properly to keep the spreading of  radiation down to a minimum if not at all, the possibility still exists. It is true that cats and dogs are less obedient and stationary by nature and that their curiosity creates trouble. In this sense, I believe it is rightful to keep pets in a place separated from their respective owners. Whether or not this may traumatize the pets is another issue. Unless a system is developed so that a specialized pet home is required to be bought or something similar to this type of separation, bringing home radioactively induced pets is unwise.

Hackers trying to help WikiLeaks


Cassell Bryan-Low of the Wall Street Journal gives us some insight about hackers toying with many corporations that have disgraced WikiLeaks. Although these hackers have been mainly attacking enemies by slowing down the loading speed of the companies' website pages.
 The Swedish Prosecution Service said Wednesday that its website had been flooded overnight by denial of service attacks. The prosecutors' office said it reported the incident to Swedish police. The website for Claes Borgstrom, the lawyer representing the two women making the accusations against Mr. Assange, also crashed.
 Although believing in a cause such as WikiLeaks is a worthy personal trait, exacting revenge in this day and age on such a wide scale is pure recklessness and stupidity. Especially when the targets are big named and incredibly powerful such as MasterCard and PayPal. While the offense may only be minor, since the hackers were just causing unnatural web-traffic, the shear amount of victims make up for that.


Mental Health Break

China's Youku surges to attention

Lee Spears talks about the sudden jump in prosperity of the Chinese version of Youtube, Youku. Youku is one of China's largest online video viewing companies and have no plans to be stopped.
Youku.com Inc. surged in the biggest gain for a U.S. initial public offering in five years and E- Commerce China Dangdang Inc. almost doubled in its debut, the latest sign of booming demand for Chinese Internet companies. Youku.com, China’s largest online video company, soared 161 percent to $33.44 today, after completing a $203 million IPO.
This is fairly significant for investers because of China's special conditions. In China, videos from American video viewing websites are blocked such as Youtube. Therefore, domestic websites such as Youku and Tudou are able to take the lead in that sector. Because of this special policy, China is able to keep their viewers dedicated to domestic companies as well as a steady surge of online users as its population grows.

Pay for your Actual Milage

Mark Glover discusses the new Pay-as-you-go insurance policies being offered in the new future in California. This will save many vehicle drivers a lot of money and charge for what they actually drive.
State Farm now has about 3.3 million policyholders throughout California, which accounted for $2.5 billion in premiums in 2009. The insurer estimates that 25 percent of its policyholders will select the program, resulting in an annual savings of $31 million.
By offering many more insurance plans available for customers, insurance companies, not as popular as AAA, will have a chance of reeling in potential customers. This new idea is especially efficient for the older community who drive only when needed and are currently paying prices for milage they do not drive. The only bad aspect of this idea is that one must implant a device that records one's milage. This can be a small breech of privacy as no one really knows if there are cameras or even microphones secretly slapped into the device as well. One possible conflict that could arise is that there are those who are going to try to tamper with the device to lower their milage reading.